FINAL COUNTDOWN, EUROPE
Very interesting playlist tonight.
Now, back to the river and the landscape.
It is very important for the river to flow, no matter how rigid the landscape is.
Here is the deal. I should not seek acknowledgment from the landscape. As a river, I simply flow. Oblivious of the feedback.
Being the river, I rule. I decide on my path. Water finds the path of least resistance. Water finds its own level.
Been there done that.
I tell you what, I choose my own landscape. The landscape cannot choose the river. The one that moves chooses.
So the key is in the moving. Without movement, water becomes stagnant.
Water cannot simply flow. *I[] (It) needs a landscape. In this case, the choices are a kaleidoscope.
* I like this already.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let me see... How do I put this...
Suppose I modify Pascal's Wager to come to a conclusion.
It goes like this: Els either love me or doesn't love me. Both arguments are valid because she will not tell the right answer.
In this case, I *can] (have) to assert that she loves me. That's because when I make that kind of assertion, my world is spinning on its axis. On the contrary, when I assume she doesn't love me, my God, everything is mayhem.
* You just made my day.
So the conclusion is that it is better for me on the balance of probability to deduce that Els loves me than to assume that she hates my guts.
See? I flow regardless of the nature of the landscape. No need for human intervention. Pascal's Wager is sufficient.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
So what is the conclusion? I need a Pretty and Pretty Smart girl to make me happy. I mean, my first requirement is aptitude. Next is attitude. She got both.
A Brainy Chick is like a fertile piece of land. You can basically grow anything and it will bear healthy produce.
Most people don't see that. I am in the business of Exploring Potential, so I appreciate PPS.
mm
No comments:
Post a Comment